What is it about?

This article employs Lacan’s theory about the self and about the way that our self-image is constituted to highlight some crucial differences between one important Roman Catholic philosophical religious anthropology and one interpretation of the Theravāda Buddhist theory of anattā. It concludes that one persuaded of Lacanian theory would be likely to regard the Roman Catholic model of personal-identity as fostering a particularly tenacious and dangerous illusion, while being likely to view the Theravādan philosophy more favourably, regarding it as encouraging a similar process of ego-deconstruction to that available within Lacanian psychoanalysis.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Fragmentary Selves and God-given Identity, Journal of Indian Philosophy and Religion, January 2006, Philosophy Documentation Center,
DOI: 10.5840/jipr2006115.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page