What is it about?
Automation increases corporate power.
Featured Image
Photo by Possessed Photography on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Markup tax can achieve a win-win situation in which the fiscal policy increases economic growth and reduces inequality between skilled workers and unskilled workers, addressing equity-efficiency tradeoff.
Perspectives
This research contributes to the recent policy discussion on corporate income taxation in favor of taxing supernormal profits of firms. The markup tax analyzed in our model is in principle equivalent to a tax on rent. Examples of rent tax include cash flow tax (Auerbach et al. 2017; Carton et al. 2019), residual profits tax (Beer et al. 2020), and allowance for corporate equity (Hebous and Klemm 2020). The main argument in the field of public finance so far has been profit shifting and tax avoidance of multinationals that pay very low effective tax rates on profits. For instance, the OECD’s inclusive framework on BEPS is based on the idea of taxing excess profits of foreign subsidiaries (pillar two minimum tax) because it is not easy to calculate the arm’s length price for the value of intangible assets. Our research reinforces the idea of the superiority of rent tax when artificial intelligence/robots/Big Tech companies are accompanied by monopolistic corporate power.
Dr. Ryota Nakatani
International Monetary Fund
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: For the Benefit of All: Fiscal Policies and Equity-Efficiency Trade-offs in the Age of Automation, IMF Working Paper, July 2021, International Monetary Fund,
DOI: 10.5089/9781513592961.001.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page