What is it about?
A review paper examines how meticulous application of statistical methods is an ethical obligation in medical studies. It highlights common errors like p-hacking and over-reliance on p-values that can undermine findings. Real examples show such mistakes resulting in public harm. Recommendations include more statistical rigor in assessing proposals, requiring open access data, and mandating an ethical discussion.
Featured Image
Photo by Chris Liverani on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This timely paper underscores the responsibility researchers have to apply statistics appropriately. With medical research advancing rapidly, statistical principles provide an analytical framework to ensure ethical clinical trials and reproducible conclusions. Flawed statistics can violate ethical tenets, harm patients, and erode public trust.
Perspectives
As a physician, I find this paper compelling in drawing attention to the outsized impact statistical methods have in upholding research integrity. I have witnessed first-hand how easily p-values get misinterpreted, or statistical limitations get glossed over. The ramifications can be severe, from fuelling vaccine hesitancy to increasing heart attacks among postmenopausal women. More rigorous statistical review of proposals, openly accessible data, and explicit ethical discussions are sensible recommendations. We must continually re-examine statistical assumptions and approach data with humility. Upholding ethical principles relies directly on the meticulous, ethical application of statistical tools.
Thomas F Heston MD
University of Washington
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Statistical Ethics in Medical Research: A Narrative Review, Journal of Clinical Medical Research, December 2023, Athenaeum Scientific Publishers,
DOI: 10.46889/jcmr.2023.4308.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
