What is it about?
Since its outbreak, the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus (also called ‘SARS-CoV-2’) has claimed thousands of lives and made numerous others ill. Hospitals and medical workers faced an un-precedented storm of infected patients requiring medical attention. Such demanding and high-throughput situations can often lead to diagnostic errors in a medical laboratory. The authors of this study provide a clear overview of potential vulnerabilities and factors that could sway the accuracy of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)— the current gold standard tool for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection. They categorise these into three segments. First, the general preanalytical problems–such as inadequate collection, improper swab storage, and manual and identification errors. Second, specific issues like contamination of samples or testing of patients taking antiretroviral therapy. And third, analytical errors such as instrument malfunction, testing outside the diagnostic window, or active viral recombination. The authors suggest that combining clinical evidence from RT-PCR tests with chest computed tomography (CT) results, along with the considera-tion of epidemiologic, clinical and radiological factors while analysing RT-PCR results could help minimise diagnostic errors. They also highlight the need for further refinement of molecular targets and quality assurance in analytical procedures to ensure the highest possible accuracy.
Featured Image
Photo by Mufid Majnun on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Diagnostic errors can not only affect the wellbeing of an individual but also jeopardise public health and national/international measures to contain the spread of infection. A false negative might foster the further spread of the virus via human-to-human interaction and endanger lives, while a false positive could lead to unnecessary treatment resulting in social and economic adversities. KEY TAKEAWAY Laboratory medicine plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and containment of infectious and transmissible diseases like COVID-19. Hence, reducing testing errors in RT-PCRs is of paramount importance.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Potential preanalytical and analytical vulnerabilities in the laboratory diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), March 2020, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0285.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Increased risk of blood clotting in patients with SARS-CoV-2
Routine tests to monitor blood coagulation may help with early identification of severe forms of COVID-19 infections and help to reduce disease severity.
Laboratory abnormalities in diagnostic tests for Covid-19 infection
Laboratory medicine plays a crucial role in the early detection and management of many diseases. An overview of the various abnormalities encountered during in-vitro diagnostic tests of patients is vital to understanding the clinical characteristics and behaviour of a disease like COVID-19.
Examining trends in COVID-19 infected patients from a community hospital in the US
Larger prospective studies should focus on fully comprehending the clinical features of COVID-19-infected patients across various ethnicities.
The various features of COVID-19
One of the first published summaries of the disease and its diagnosis, aimed at improving disease management and control.
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page