What is it about?
This report examines the law relating to employers' liability for causing personal injury in the UK. It compares liability in tort with the provision made by the social security scheme in paying industrial injuries benefit. It examines the different legal bases of these schemes and compares their importance by using various statistical analyses. A contrast can be drawn between the public insurance provided by the state and the private insurance which backs the law of tort. The paper argues that the two systems in practice provide comparable amounts of compensation and neither ought necessarily to be seen as inferior to the other. Why, however, preferential benefit continues to be available to those injured at work is called into question.
Featured Image
Photo by Tom Jur on Unsplash
Why is it important?
In describing and comparing both the tort system and social security systems of compensation this report is very unusual and breaks new academic ground. Although in the UK there is a very extensive literature about the law of tort, there is very little written about workers’ compensation under the state scheme. In large part this is because lawyers are ever-present in tort claims whereas they are very rarely involved in applications for social security benefits. By comparing the two regimes, this paper sets out a context for work injury compensation which has not been made in recent years. In particular, the comparative statistical analysis offers a new treatment. In many respects, albeit in this summarised form, this chapter provides a unique source.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Employers’ Liability and Workers’ Compensation: England and Wales, De Gruyter,
DOI: 10.1515/9783110270211.137.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page