What is it about?
A letter to the editor raises concerns about a study that compared exercise treadmill testing to exercise myocardial perfusion imaging in women with suspected coronary artery disease. The letter points out the study's low power, the use of medical tests as a surrogate for clinical management changes, and questions whether either test is useful in low-risk symptomatic women.
Featured Image
Photo by Joshua Chehov on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This letter highlights important limitations of a study comparing diagnostic tests for women with suspected coronary artery disease. It raises crucial questions about the study's power, the use of surrogate variables, and the clinical utility of the tests in low-risk patients. These concerns are relevant for interpreting the study's results and their application to patient care.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Letter by Heston Regarding Article, “Comparative Effectiveness of Exercise Electrocardiography With or Without Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Women With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Results From the What Is the..., Circulation, May 2012, Wolters Kluwer Health,
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.111.069286.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page