What is it about?
The article examines and compares the institutional structures of Armenian diasporas of Russia and Lebanon with the intention of identifying factors that could explain the diverging outcomes in institution building and identity preservation in these communities.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Based on the existing theoretical literature, the article explores the main factors that influence the characteristics of particular communities, including discussion of conditions in the hostland, the origins of a community as well as the level of institutionalization of diasporic organizations.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Institutions and identity politics in the Armenian diaspora: the cases of Russia and Lebanon, Diaspora Studies, October 2016, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/09739572.2016.1239436.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page