What is it about?
Title: Scholarly Research of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis Abstract: This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of scholarly research on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Environmental Management (EM). By analyzing a vast corpus of academic publications, this paper maps the evolution, key themes, influential authors, leading journals, and emerging trends in CSR and EM research. Utilizing data from databases such as Scopus and Web of Science, the study employs bibliometric techniques, including co-citation analysis, keyword co-occurrence, and citation network analysis, to provide a structured overview of the field. The findings highlight the growing interdisciplinary nature of CSR and EM research, the shift from theoretical frameworks to empirical studies, and the increasing focus on sustainability, stakeholder engagement, and regulatory impacts. This study serves as a valuable resource for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners seeking to understand the current state and future directions of CSR and EM scholarship. Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Environmental Management (EM), Bibliometric Analysis, Sustainability, Scholarly Research 1. Introduction Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Environmental Management (EM) have become critical areas of research due to increasing global concerns about sustainability, climate change, and ethical business practices. Scholarly interest in CSR and EM has grown exponentially, leading to a vast and diverse body of literature. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis to systematically evaluate research trends, intellectual structures, and knowledge gaps in CSR and EM studies. 2. Methodology This research employs bibliometric techniques to analyze: Publication trends (annual growth, leading countries, institutions) Citation analysis (most influential papers and authors) Co-citation and co-authorship networks (collaboration patterns) Keyword co-occurrence (major themes and emerging topics) Data is extracted from Scopus and Web of Science, covering peer-reviewed articles from 2000 to 2023. 3. Key Findings 3.1 Evolution of CSR and EM Research Steady growth in publications, with a significant surge post-2010. Increased focus on sustainability reporting, circular economy, and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) metrics. 3.2 Influential Authors and Journals Leading contributors include scholars from business, environmental science, and economics. Top journals: Journal of Business Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Sustainability. 3.3 Emerging Themes Green CSR: Integration of environmental sustainability in corporate strategies. Stakeholder Theory: Role of investors, consumers, and regulators in CSR adoption. Digital Transformation: Impact of AI and big data on EM practices. 4. Implications and Future Research Directions Practical Implications: Helps businesses align CSR strategies with global sustainability goals. Research Gaps: Need for more studies on CSR in developing economies and industry-specific EM practices. 5. Conclusion This bibliometric analysis provides a holistic view of CSR and EM research, highlighting its multidisciplinary nature and evolving focus on sustainability. The findings can guide future research and corporate strategies in achieving environmental and social objectives.
Featured Image
Photo by Hannah Busing on Unsplash
Why is it important?
A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Environmental Management (EM) research is crucial for several reasons: 1. Tracking the Evolution of Research Trends CSR and EM are rapidly evolving fields due to global sustainability challenges (e.g., climate change, ethical governance). Bibliometrics helps identify key milestones, shifts in focus (e.g., from compliance-driven CSR to strategic sustainability), and emerging topics like ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investing and circular economy. 2. Identifying Knowledge Gaps and Future Research Directions By analyzing publication patterns, researchers can detect understudied areas, such as: CSR in developing economies Industry-specific EM strategies (e.g., manufacturing vs. tech) The role of digital technologies (AI, blockchain) in sustainability reporting 3. Assessing Academic and Corporate Influence Bibliometrics reveals the most influential authors, institutions, and journals, helping: Researchers identify key thought leaders. Businesses and policymakers find credible sources for best practices. Academic institutions prioritize impactful research areas. 4. Understanding Global Collaboration Patterns CSR and EM are global concerns, but research contributions vary by region. Bibliometric analysis highlights: Leading countries (e.g., U.S., U.K., China) in CSR/EM research. Collaboration networks between universities, corporations, and governments. 5. Supporting Evidence-Based Policy and Business Strategies Businesses use bibliometric insights to: Align CSR strategies with global sustainability trends (e.g., UN SDGs). Benchmark against industry leaders in environmental stewardship. Policymakers can identify research-backed regulations for corporate sustainability. 6. Enhancing Research Efficiency New scholars can use bibliometric maps to: Avoid redundant studies. Focus on high-impact research questions. Discover interdisciplinary connections (e.g., CSR + finance, CSR + technology). Conclusion A bibliometric analysis of CSR and EM is not just an academic exercise—it provides actionable insights for researchers, businesses, and policymakers striving for sustainable development. By systematically reviewing past and present research, stakeholders can make data-driven decisions to advance corporate responsibility and environmental sustainability.
Perspectives

uture Perspectives in Scholarly Research on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Environmental Management (EM) The bibliometric analysis of CSR and EM research highlights not only past and present trends but also opens avenues for future exploration. Below are key emerging perspectives that can shape the next phase of scholarly inquiry and practical applications in this field. 1. Integration of Digital Technologies and AI in CSR & EM Perspective: The rise of AI, big data, and blockchain presents new opportunities for: Automated sustainability reporting (real-time ESG tracking). Predictive analytics for environmental risk management. Transparent supply chain monitoring (e.g., ethical sourcing via blockchain). Future research should explore: How AI-driven CSR strategies impact stakeholder trust. Ethical concerns around algorithmic bias in sustainability decisions. 2. CSR in the Context of Climate Change and Circular Economy Perspective: Increasing regulatory pressures (e.g., EU Green Deal, SEC climate disclosures) demand more rigorous corporate environmental accountability. Research should focus on: Circular business models (zero-waste production, product-life extension). Climate adaptation strategies for vulnerable industries (agriculture, energy). Carbon credit markets and their influence on CSR investments. 3. Expanding CSR Research Beyond Western Contexts Perspective: Most CSR studies focus on Europe and North America, neglecting: Emerging economies (Africa, Southeast Asia, Latin America). Informal sector businesses that lack structured CSR frameworks. Future studies should examine: Cultural influences on CSR adoption (e.g., communal vs. shareholder-driven models). Localized sustainability challenges (e.g., water scarcity, deforestation). 4. The Role of Stakeholder Capitalism and ESG Investing Perspective: The shift from shareholder primacy to stakeholder capitalism demands new research on: Investor influence on CSR policies (e.g., BlackRock’s ESG mandates). Greenwashing vs. genuine sustainability efforts – how to measure impact. Employee activism (e.g., workers demanding eco-friendly workplaces). 5. Policy and Regulatory Implications for CSR & EM Perspective: Governments are increasingly mandating CSR compliance (e.g., India’s CSR law, EU’s CSRD). Research should assess: Effectiveness of regulatory frameworks in driving real change. Cross-border policy conflicts (e.g., differing ESG standards in U.S. vs. EU). Public-private partnerships for large-scale sustainability projects. 6. Behavioral and Ethical Dimensions of CSR Perspective: Beyond corporate policies, future research should explore: Consumer psychology – why some customers boycott unethical brands while others don’t. Leadership ethics – how CEO values shape CSR commitments. Moral vs. strategic CSR – are companies doing good for ethics or profit? 7. Interdisciplinary Approaches to CSR & EM Perspective: CSR and EM research must bridge gaps between: Business studies (profitability vs. sustainability). Environmental science (measuring ecological impact). Political economy (how governments incentivize green practices). Potential areas: CSR in the gig economy (e.g., Uber, Airbnb’s environmental footprint). Neuro-economics of sustainability (how brain science influences eco-friendly choices). Conclusion: The Path Forward The future of CSR and EM research lies in interdisciplinary collaboration, technological innovation, and global inclusivity. As businesses face mounting pressure to balance profit with planetary health, academia must provide data-driven, actionable insights to guide sustainable transformation. Key Takeaways for Researchers & Practitioners: ✅ Adopt emerging tech (AI, blockchain) for smarter CSR. ✅ Focus on underrepresented regions (Global South, SMEs). ✅ Study behavioral drivers behind CSR adoption. ✅ Align with policy shifts (ESG regulations, carbon pricing).
Prof. Ramphul Ohlan
Maharshi Dayanand University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Scholarly Research of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis, Serials Review, August 2022, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2022.2101756.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page