What is it about?
This study examines the social media dynamics surrounding environmental activist Greta Thunberg during the UN Climate Change Conference COP25 in December 2019. Analyzing over 1.3 million tweets, the research reveals how Thunberg's presence incited significant emotional responses, particularly hate speech, amplified by social media's echo chambers and filter bubbles. The findings highlight the polarization of public opinion and the role of influential figures in shaping discourse.
Featured Image
Photo by Dedale on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This research is crucial as it underscores the impact of social media on public sentiment, demonstrating how negative emotions can proliferate and influence societal debates, particularly on critical issues like climate change.
Perspectives

From my personal perspective, this article critically examines the interaction between social media, public emotion and discourse, raises real concern about the rise of hate speech and its implications for social polarization, and advocates for rigorous analytical methods. to better understand these dynamics. Through this analysis, we aim to shed light on how individual narratives can influence public sentiment and contribute to the broader discourse around social issues.
Sergio Arce García
Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Online hate speech and emotions on Twitter: a case study of Greta Thunberg at the UN Climate Change Conference COP25 in 2019, Social Network Analysis and Mining, March 2023, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/s13278-023-01052-5.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page