What is it about?

In this article, after reviewing traditional arguments from design, I consider some more recent versions: the so-called ‘new design arguments’ for the existence of God. These arguments enjoy an apparent advantage over the traditional arguments from design by avoiding some of Hume’s famous criticisms. However, in seeking to render religion and science compatible, it seems that they require a modification not only of our scientific understanding but also of the traditional conception of God. Moreover, there is a key problem with arguments from design that Mill raised to which the new arguments seem no less vulnerable than the older versions.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Arguments from design: A self-defeating strategy?, Philosophia, December 2005, Springer Science + Business Media,
DOI: 10.1007/bf02652657.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page