What is it about?

Laboratory study shows cavitation erosion is unlikely in natural river channels and indicates those channels in which cavitation erosion might be identified

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Erosion of bedrock channels is a hot topic, related to landscape incision modelling, but yet the role of cavitation in channel erosion has been debated for more than 80 years. This paper reports the first study specifically designed to explore erosion of bedrock channels by cavitation using an laboratory experimental flow channel.

Perspectives

Developing the experiments for this article had been in my mind for several years, not least because cavitation has an almost mystical aura such that many papers over several decades have suggested it is important for erosion of natural bedrock channels. However, this supposition was purely speculative and unsupported by data. A simple consideration of the physics, before we designed the experiments, demonstrated that such importance was unlikely. Rather than just demonstrating that cavitation is unlikely to be a substantive factor in bedrock channel erosion, the paper does suggest the kind of channels and locations worldwide where cavitation erosion might be identified and provides pointers for future laboratory- based research into cavitation.

Prof Paul A. Carling
University of Southampton

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The bubble bursts for cavitation in natural rivers: laboratory experiments reveal minor role in bedrock erosion, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, January 2017, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1002/esp.4101.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page