What is it about?

Medical evidence is not always obtained in child sexual abuse cases. However, jurors are often uninformed of this detail and weigh the absence of evidence in their decision-making on whether or not abuse occurred. Further, race of the victim also influences juror decision-making, as prior research has found jurors are less likely to believe African American victims. The present study found medical evidence also significantly predicted whether participants believed the victim or not, and there was a significant interaction between race of the defendant and race of the victim on victim believability.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Results from our study suggest that increased education and awareness with regard to the prevalence of, and problems associated with, reliance on forensic medical evidence in child sexual abuse cases could be valuable. Further, this research can help better inform jurors about evidence in child sexual abuse cases.

Perspectives

This article helps advocate for child sexual abuse survivors as they proceed through trial.

Dr. Apryl Alexander
University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Simulated judicial decision‐making for African and European American adolescents with illegal sexual behavior: The impact of medical data and victim race/ethnicity, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, December 2019, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2431.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page