What is it about?
On the cognitive adequacy of models of constructional change. Further elaborated in "The development of non-deontic BE BOUND TO in a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar perspective". Preprint available from the HKU Scholars Hub: http://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/236401/1/content.pdf
Featured Image
Why is it important?
It offers reflection on what a "usage-based" approach to language change entails.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar, Belgian Journal of Linguistics, December 2016, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/bjl.30.03noe.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
