What is it about?
This chapter reviews the concept of Nonhuman Animal rights in the context of environmental inequality.
Featured Image
Photo by Randall Ruiz on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Historically the environmental inequality discourse has centered the human experience, although a number of environmental injustices have impacted human and nonhuman minorities in intersecting ways and Nonhuman Animals are arguably the largest minority group harmed. The assault on nonhuman communities, for that matter, is a lead driver of climate change. The exclusion of Nonhuman Animal constituencies, therefore, is not only a scientific oversight, but also a serious ethical inconsistency.
Perspectives
Vegan feminist theory is introduced to address the anthropocentric intersectional failure that typifies mainstream environmental justice efforts, arguing that the false divide erected between nature and civilization has historically abstracted freeliving Nonhuman Animals within larger conversations about ecosystems and species, undermining their individual rights. This divide also makes little space for domesticated animals who are neither categorized as part of nature (being human constructs), nor civilization (as animals), despite their considerable capacity to benefit from environmental justice initiatives. Environmental justice must balance the individual rights of nonhumans, ecosystem needs, and the intersectional experiences of humans and other animals to truly embody its aims to rectify and redress environmental inequalities and to effectively incorporate the aims of Nonhuman Animal rights for a sustainable and fair multispecies society.
Dr Corey Lee Wrenn
University of Kent
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Nonhuman Animal rights, June 2023, Edward Elgar Publishing,
DOI: 10.4337/9781800881136.00019.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
