What is it about?

This article investigates the incentives academic authors have to publish in predatory journals. It finds that at one Canadian business school, the authors of predatory publications receive both financial rewards and research awards. Moreover, predatory publications do not appear to be a barrier to being hired, or gaining tenure and promotion. Contrary to previous research, it finds that it is not necessarily inexperienced authors who publish in predatory journals.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Predatory publications are a significant and growing problem in academia. Most of the previous research has examined the supply side of the market (publishers selling their services to authors). Moreover, studies of the demand side of the market, have usually not focused on the incentives authors have to buy publications in predatory journals. Without understanding these incentives, policies to combat the problems created by predatory journals are unlikely to be successful.

Perspectives

This paper is an example of taking lemons and making lemon aid. I disliked being employed by an institution where the majority of researchers published in predatory journals and were rewarded for doing so. However, as I learnt more about the literature related to predatory publications, I realized that the silver lining of working at my university was the opportunity to conduct an unique and original study of the rewards of predatory publications. Although this is the most nontechnical paper I have written, I suspect/hope it will have a greater impact than most of my other articles.

Derek Pyne
Thompson Rivers University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School, Journal of Scholarly Publishing, April 2017, University of Toronto Press (UTPress),
DOI: 10.3138/jsp.48.3.137.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page