What is it about?
The study finds no significant relationship between pre-pandemic health expenditures and the outcomes of COVID-19 in terms of cases and mortality rates, even when controlling for the population over age 65. The analysis, which includes government and private health spending from 2017 to 2019 along with fiscal measures related to pandemic policies, suggests that neither type of health expenditure significantly affected COVID-19 outcomes. Instead, the study highlights that demographic factors, such as the proportion of older adults, play a more decisive role in influencing the pandemic’s impact. This research underlines the complexity of pandemic response effectiveness and suggests that increased healthcare spending alone may not directly improve outcomes, pointing towards the necessity for strategies that address specific population vulnerabilities.
Featured Image
Photo by Martha Dominguez de Gouveia on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The study critically assesses the impact of health spending on pandemic outcomes, debunking the notion that higher expenditures guarantee better results, and emphasizes the need for nuanced health economic and policy insights. It highlights the significant effects of COVID-19 on older populations, advocating for policies tailored to demographic vulnerabilities. With its analysis of 20 OECD countries, the study offers a comprehensive international perspective, showing how different national policies affect pandemic management. Its timeliness is crucial for public health strategy and fiscal planning.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Preparation and Response to COVID-19: An Exploratory Analysis of Policy Response Spending and Health Expenditures in 20 OECD Countries, The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, January 2021, WMU Department of Occupational Therapy,
DOI: 10.15453/0191-5096.4499.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page