What is it about?
It is the contention of this paper that in order to make the most effective contribution to leadership in this century of complexity, unprecedented interconnectivity, interdependence, radical innovation and transformation, and unforeseen new structures with unexpected new properties, it is important to go beyond using a single method to generally using multiple methods and combining several methodologies, in whole or in part, and possibly from different paradigms, and different disciplines. This is the underlying thesis of this paper based both on theoretical/philosophical grounds and on the practical grounds that practitioners are increasingly doing this already.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Mixed methods and multimethods are two different research approaches but quite often some academics have used the other as the research approach and referred to the research erroneously as the other. In the literature, it is common to find the terms ‘mixed methods’ and ‘multimethods’ used interchangeably. However, it is important to distinguish these terms.
Perspectives
Mixed methods and multimethods research approaches are uniquely important to leadership research. Mixed methods and multimethods research approaches can bring greater sophistication to the leadership research community in the understanding of social phenomena. These research approaches can reach out across divisions in the leadership research community, and they can strengthen the methodological arsenal of leadership researchers when they apply leadership to real-world social problems
Prof. Robert M Yawson, PhD
Quinnipiac University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The importance of multimethods and mixed methods research in understanding complexity in leadership, International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, January 2016, Inderscience Publishers,
DOI: 10.1504/ijclm.2016.087122.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
