What is it about?
Informal employment has been variously explained as resulting from: economic under-development and a lack of modernization (modernization theory); high taxes and state interference in the free market (neo-liberal theory) or inadequate levels of state intervention to protect citizens (political economy theory). The aim of this paper is to evaluate these competing theories by comparing the findings of a 2013 survey on the variations in the prevalence of informal employment across 28 nations with cross-national variations in the economic and social characteristics each theory denotes as determinants.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The finding is that informal employment is less prevalent in wealthier, modernised societies with higher levels of taxation and social protection expenditure, more effective social transfer systems and lower levels of severe material deprivation. No evidence is thus found to support neo-liberal theory, but evidence is found to support the modernization and political economy theories.
Perspectives
This paper sets out the policy changes governments need to make to reduce their informal economies
Professor Colin C Williams
University of Sheffield
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Evaluating competing theories of informal employment: some lessons from a 28-nation European survey, International Journal of Business and Globalisation, January 2015, Inderscience Publishers,
DOI: 10.1504/ijbg.2015.070223.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
