What is it about?
Successful leaders eventually reach a dysfunction phase and become conservative selfserving oligarchic. Large organizations try to prevent this by either term limits or “Golden Parachutes” despite many drawbacks of both solutions; use of intangible rewards in the form of offering leaders possibility of multiple terms with each reelection requiring a higher majority in a proper constituency is proposed instead of both current solutions.
Featured Image
Photo by Quino Al on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The current solutions cause vast recalcitrant problems by replacing leaders either too early, before they reached effectiveness phase, or too late, allowing long periods of oligarchic ineffectiveness after effectiveness phase. The proposed solution will reward leaders by plausible tenure prolongation, prestigious higher majority reelection as far as they are effective and trusted by followers, and plausible creative innovation due to long time horizon, while barring dysfunctional consevatism of oligarchic continuity.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Leaders’ Timely Succession: Neither Term Limits nor “Golden Parachutes,” Rather Periodic Tests of Trust Ascendance, Journal of Applied Social Science, September 2019, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1936724419876301.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page