What is it about?
The way that some REC members see SM data as being 'up for grabs' whilst others are much more concerned about issues in relation to risk and consent.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Underlines the way that more nuanced tools are needed to help researchers and RECs negotiate risk and consent using SM data.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: From “a Fair Game” to “a Form of Covert Research”: Research Ethics Committee Members’ Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, January 2018, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1556264617751510.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
