What is it about?
This paper investigates how homeless people in Stockholm coped with urban planners' efforts to drive them away from two public places. Whereas some of the homeless people left these sites because they became unliveable after the reconstructions, others returned because they found them more liveable than before. Highlighting the nomadic ways in which homeless people inhabited urban space, the paper further shows how this was related to homeless discourses of apathy, cynicism and contentment.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
By highlighting how planning efforts can be subverted with very limited resources and without an explicit strategic agenda, the paper gives hope that political change can be pursued from the margins.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: All talk and no movement? Homeless coping and resistance to urban planning, Organization, July 2012, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.1177/1350508411414228.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page