What is it about?
This article examines how wild boars are seen as "beasts" in the Anthropocene by looking at their physical traits and the policies aimed at controlling their populations. The study explores the social and political implications of labeling this species as a "beast." Specifically, it focuses on how wild boars have been described and portrayed as intimidating and dangerous within Uruguay’s hunting and conservation communities. By analyzing how the hunting of wild boars is justified and how they are made legitimate targets for eradication, the article highlights how hunters position themselves as protectors of biodiversity and agricultural production rather than as mere sport hunters. The author argues that the concept of "beastliness" plays a crucial role in wildlife management strategies for wild boars.
Featured Image
Photo by Anastasiya on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This study is important because it shows how the labels we assign to animals, like calling wild boars "beasts," influence wildlife management policies and hunting practices. By understanding these perceptions, we can question and improve conservation strategies and biodiversity management.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The Weight of Beastly Traits: Biopolitics and Imaginations around Wild Boar Hunting in Uruguay, Society and Animals, August 2024, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/15685306-bja10217.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page