What is it about?

This article examines how wild boars are seen as "beasts" in the Anthropocene by looking at their physical traits and the policies aimed at controlling their populations. The study explores the social and political implications of labeling this species as a "beast." Specifically, it focuses on how wild boars have been described and portrayed as intimidating and dangerous within Uruguay’s hunting and conservation communities. By analyzing how the hunting of wild boars is justified and how they are made legitimate targets for eradication, the article highlights how hunters position themselves as protectors of biodiversity and agricultural production rather than as mere sport hunters. The author argues that the concept of "beastliness" plays a crucial role in wildlife management strategies for wild boars.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This study is important because it shows how the labels we assign to animals, like calling wild boars "beasts," influence wildlife management policies and hunting practices. By understanding these perceptions, we can question and improve conservation strategies and biodiversity management.

Perspectives

It is important because it shows the relationship between historical processes of categorization and public policies of wildlife management

Dr. Juan Martin Dabezies
University of Maryland at College Park

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: The Weight of Beastly Traits: Biopolitics and Imaginations around Wild Boar Hunting in Uruguay, Society and Animals, August 2024, Brill,
DOI: 10.1163/15685306-bja10217.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page