What is it about?

This research is based on the premise that case-based and large-sample studies are truly complementary as neither alone provides the necessary weight of evidence to draw conclusions about the truth of research hypotheses in the social sciences. It draws on a recent article in which the authors analyzed case-based research manuscripts published in JITCAR and six leading IS journals between 2000 and 2011 to identify imbalances between large-sample statistical research and case-based research. It identifies four sub-disciplines where case-based research is lacking, and for each suggests topics and research questions that are particularly appropriate for case-based research.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

There is no shortage of research questions for IS researchers to address with case studies. To provide a proper balance between large-sample statistical research and case-based research, we would like to encourage researchers to explore sub-disciplines of IS that previously have not been proportionally represented. We have identified four such sub-disciplines: business intelligence, business analytics and big data, IT use by individuals, value of IT, and human resources. Within each sub-discipline, we have suggested topics and research questions that are particularly appropriate for case-based research.

Perspectives

This paper provides an editorial perspective on the following publication: Gordon, S., Blake, R., & Shankaranarayanan, G. (2013). Case-based research in information systems: Gaps and trends. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Applications, 10(2), 47–68.

Dr Steven Gordon
Babson College

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: An Agenda for Case-Based Research, Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, April 2014, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/15228053.2014.940258.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page