What is it about?
This article examines the main lessons from 30 years of outsourcing around the world, and the more recent experiences of insourcing. It explores the reasons why having an organisational split between service commissioners and providers can have major advantages - and also the down sides of such a split. It shows how the greatly increased range of mechanisms for service provision - such as intensive co-production with citizens, genuine partnerships with the private and third sectors, contracting for social value with social enterprises, and a more outcome-based focus, has increased the opportunities for the service commissioning role to be much more creative and cost-effective.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
As the savage cuts in public expenditure take effect in the UK and many other countries across the world, governments are increasingly turning to outsourcing as a way of keeping up outcomes in spite of falling budgets. This article shows why this sometimes works - and why it sometimes turns out very badly.
Perspectives
This article follows up my Public Administration article in 2006 on how developing new relationships with the market in procurement of public services and shows that using the market mechanism has become an even greater opportunity for improving the provision of some public services - but has also developed even more pitfalls for those who use the market unwisely.
Professor Tony Bovaird
University of Birmingham
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The ins and outs of outsourcing and insourcing: what have we learnt from the past 30 years?, Public Money & Management, September 2015, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2015.1093298.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
