Social robotics research and development should include expertise from the Humanities.

What is it about?

We introduce a new approach or method for how to develop social robotics applications in the most responsible fashion. This approach is called "Integrative Social Robotics", and we motivate this approach and present its five leading principles. We argue the current social robotics research is conducted without including relevant expertise. One would not develop a weeding robot without involving a plant expert, but engineers develop social robotics without involving the experts on human social experiences, ethics, and social well-being, namely, researchers from anthropology, philosophy, social psychology, and cognitive science. It is a misconception to believe that the engineers themselves can provide expert knowledge in these areas. One of the principles of Integrative Social Robotics thus calls for the involvement of all relevant expertise. Another principle, the so-called 'Non-Replacement Maxim' says that "Robots may only do what humans should but cannot do". This principle introduced a value-geared perspective into robotics development from the very beginning--it generates a value-focused discussion among all stakeholders throughout the research and development process. Only in the course of value-focused joint deliberations that includes all involved and all relevant expert knowledge can we create responsible, culturally sustainable applications of this new technology. As a more marginal issue, we discuss whether social robotics will become a a field where different disciplines can be integrated into one comprehensive framework.

Featured Image

Photo by Andy Kelly on Unsplash

Photo by Andy Kelly on Unsplash

Why is it important?

Since the social robotics market is developing fast, it is crucially important to develop concrete recommendations for how to ensure that we are using this new technology in the right way. Social robotics is caught in the predicament that we currently do not yet have sufficient research data to assess the potential negative effects of social robotics, and will only have them at a time when we no longer can extract the technology (so-called Collingridge dilemma). As we argue, in social robotics this predicament appears as a triple gridlock of description, evaluation, and regulation. Integrative Social Robotics is an approach that helps us to escape this predicament.

Perspectives