What is it about?
This article critically exams a recent meta-analysis of a client feedback system. The authors conclude that half of the studies included in the analysis were fatally flawed and therefore resulted in the meta-analytic study misrepresenting the demonstrated value of the client feedback intervention.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
This article encourages readers to critically evaluate the claims of meta-analytic studies using the provided guidelines.
Perspectives
We wrote this article not only because the study included investigations that were egregiously flawed but also because of our concern that some behavioral health organizations might conclude that implementation of the client feedback intervention is not worth the extensive effort required.
Barry Duncan
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: When meta-analysis misleads: A critical case study of a meta-analysis of client feedback., Psychological Services, October 2019, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/ser0000398.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
