What is it about?

A positive perception of one’s academic abilities—termed academic self-concept—is a desirable educational goal. As a consequence of social comparison processes, academic self-concept is assumed to be negatively affected when students are placed in classrooms composed of high achieving classmates. We investigated these comparison processes in course-by-course tracked systems in which students are members of several class environments. Our findings suggest that students build their academic self-concept in a certain domain, for instance in math, to a major extent in comparisons with domain-specific class environments (e.g., the math class) and to a minor extent with domain-unrelated class environments. Our study contributes to the psychological understanding of academic self-concept formation and refines big fish little pond effect implications in course-by-course tracked systems: Students’ academic self-concept in a certain domain may be hurt when placing them in high achieving domain-specific classes but it will to a lesser extent also be hurt when placing them in high achieving domain-unrelated classrooms.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Which class matters? Juxtaposing multiple class environments as frames-of-reference for academic self-concept formation., Journal of Educational Psychology, January 2022, American Psychological Association (APA),
DOI: 10.1037/edu0000491.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page