What is it about?
Compared to the conventional ABAB-format, sequential tournaments in the ABBA-format are supposed to be fair. Here, person A has the first shot, person B has the next two shots, then person A has two more shots and so on, alternating the role of the "first-mover". In a basketball free-throw field experiment with a low scoring rate, we find a second-mover advantage in short ABBA-games with four attempts each and no first- or second-mover advantage with ten attempts each. Player B seems to perceive a psychological advantage in short sequential competitions. Participants with higher locus of control show a perform worse in our experiment.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
To our knowledge, this is the first study on the ABBA-format that varies the length of the ABBA-sequence. This is important because most studies assume a fixed length of sequence, while in the real world, especially in the economic context, the length of sequential tournaments is not fixed.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: The fairness of long and short ABBA-sequences: A basketball free-throw field experiment, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, December 2020, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2020.101562.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page