What is it about?
The use of AI in scientific article reviewing has both benefits and limitations. An example is given where the AI gave an incorrect and potentially dangerous answer, highlighting the potential consequences of relying solely on AI for research evaluation.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The tool has benefits such as detecting linguistic and typographical errors in manuscripts. The AI gave an incorrect and potentially dangerous answer regarding the bond energies of molecules in an oral tumor. The use of AI for scientific research evaluation can be a double-edged sword, as it may provide inaccurate information that could have serious consequences.
Perspectives
The use of AI techniques, specifically the Chat-GPT based "Review Assistant" by Elsevier, for reviewing scientific articles is discussed.
Dr. Marwan Al-Raeei
Damascus University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: When AI goes wrong: Fatal errors in oncological research reviewing assistance Open AI based, Oral Oncology Reports, June 2024, Elsevier,
DOI: 10.1016/j.oor.2024.100292.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
