What is it about?

Empirical research has not consistently identified antecedents for predicting post-acquisition performance. We employ meta-analytic techniques to empirically assess the impact of the most commonly researched antecedent variables on post-acquisition performance. We find robust results indicating that, on average and across the most commonly studied variables, acquiring firms’ performance does not positively change as a function of their acquisition activity, and is negatively affected to a modest extent. More importantly, our results indicate that unidentified variables may explain significant variance in post-acquisition performance, suggesting the need for additional theory development and changes to M&A research methods.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The frequency of M&A as a corporate tool and limited research findings suggest additional research on acquisition theory, acquisition integration, and interaction between research variables is needed.

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Meta-analyses of post-acquisition performance: indications of unidentified moderators, Strategic Management Journal, January 2004, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1002/smj.371.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page