What is it about?
The paper presents relationships between Subjective Well-Being (Life satisfaction, Positive Affect and Negative Affect) and temperament traits considered in the Regulative Theory of Temperament and responsible for energetic (Emotional Reactivity, Endurance, Activity) and temporal (Briskness, Perseveration) regulation. Results have shown that temperament traits more strongly predicted affective components than satisfaction. Each well-being dimension had a unique set of predictors and these sets for affective SWB dimensions are dependent on the period of development.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
Relationships between temperament traits (responsible for energetic and temporal regulation) and SWB components are more complex than could be expected from previous research on temperament-SWB (focusing on negative aspects of SWB) and personality-SWB relations (focusing mostly on the role of Neuroticism and Extraversion and neglecting the specific role of Endurance, Briskness and Perseveration). The temperamental mechanisms for affective dimensions are not universal - they depend on age group. The differences in predictions are most pronounced for the Positive Affect, suggesting that positive emotions may be facilitated or hampered by unique characteristics and conditions.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Temperamental predictors of subjective well-being from early adolescence to mid-life: The role of temporal and energetic regulation, International Journal of Psychology, February 2017, Wiley,
DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12414.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page