All Stories

  1. Norms and Practices of Public Argumentation
  2. Thou Shalt Not Squander Life – Comparing Five Approaches to Argument Strength
  3. A Scheme and Critical Questions for the argumentum ad baculum
  4. Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation
  5. Predicted as observed? How to identify empirically adequate theoretical constructs
  6. Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions
  7. Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures
  8. Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law
  9. De-Biasing Legal Factfinders
  10. Newcomb’s problem isn’t a choice dilemma
  11. An Eco-cognitive Model of Abductive Reasoning
  12. Slippery Slope Arguments in Legal Contexts: Towards Argumentative Patterns
  13. Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation
  14. Generalization in Legal Argumentation
  15. From Stories—via Arguments, Scenarios, and Cases—to Probabilities: Commentary on Floris J. Bex's “The Hybrid Theory of Stories and Arguments Applied to the Simonshaven Case” and Bart Verheij's “Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilit...
  16. A Dialectical View on Conduction: Reasons, Warrants, and Normal Suasory Inclinations
  17. Conceptual Spaces: Elaborations and Applications
  18. Hypothesis-Testing Demands Trustworthy Data—A Simulation Approach to Inferential Statistics Advocating the Research Program Strategy
  19. Data replication matters to an underpowered study, but replicated hypothesis corroboration counts
  20. Falsification
  21. Peirce Knew Why Abduction Isn’t IBE—A Scheme and Critical Questions for Abductive Argument
  22. From Discovery to Justification: Outline of an Ideal Research Program in Empirical Psychology
  23. Logic, Reasoning, Argumentation: Insights from the Wild
  24. Legal Facts in Argumentation-Based Litigation Games
  25. Does giving reasons pro and contra reduce biased decision-making in legal contexts?
  26. Causal Argument
  27. ERRATUM to “Miss Rate Neglect in Legal Evidence” by Christian Dahlman, Frank Zenker and Farhan Sarwar, Law, Probability and Risk . doi:10.1093/lpr/mgw007
  28. Extending a Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect to a Research Program
  29. Argument-Based Bayesian Estimation of Attack Graphs: A Preliminary Empirical Analysis
  30. A probabilistic analysis of argument cogency
  31. Miss rate neglect in legal evidence
  32. From reasonable preferences, via argumentation, to logic
  33. Reconstructing Recent Work on Macrosocial Stress as a Research Program
  34. Beyond Schools: Reply to Marsman, Ly, and Wagenmakers
  35. Continuity of Theory Structure: A Conceptual Spaces Approach
  36. Introduction: Reasoning, Argumentation, and Critical Thinking Instruction
  37. Using conceptual spaces to exhibit conceptual continuity through scientific theory change
  38. Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents: The State of the Art
  39. Applications of Conceptual Spaces
  40. Communication, Rationality, and Conceptual Changes in Scientific Theories
  41. Editors’ Introduction: Conceptual Spaces at Work
  42. The Laws of Belief—Ranking Theory and its Philosophical Applications
  43. From Euler to Navier–Stokes: A Spatial Analysis of Conceptual Changes in Nineteenth-century Fluid Dynamics
  44. Editors’ introduction: social dynamics and collective rationality
  45. Basic Concepts of Structuralism
  46. Perspectives on Structuralism
  47. Modeling Diachronic Changes in Structuralism and in Conceptual Spaces
  48. From Features via Frames to Spaces: Modeling Scientific Conceptual Change Without Incommensurability or Aprioricity
  49. Perspectives on Structuralism, Munich, Germany, 16–18 February 2012
  50. Bayesian Argumentation
  51. What Do Normative Approaches to Argumentation Stand to Gain from Rhetorical Insights?
  52. Bayesian Argumentation: The Practical Side of Probability
  53. Theory change as dimensional change: conceptual spaces applied to the dynamics of empirical theories
  54. Review of Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman
  55. Experts and Bias: When is the Interest-Based Objection to Expert Argumentation Sound?
  56. Parmenides as Secret Hero. Gregor Betz’s Theorie Dialektischer Strukturen (Theory of Dialectical Structures)
  57. Designing an Introductory Course to Elementary Symbolic Logic within the Blackboard E-learning Environment
  58. Analyzing Social Policy Argumentation: A case study on the opinion of the German National Ethics Council on an amendment of the Stem Cell Law
  59. Using Conceptual Spaces to Model the Dynamics of Empirical Theories
  60. Eemeren & Garssen's Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory
  61. Lakatos’s Challenge? Auxiliary Hypotheses and Non-Monotonous Inference
  62. Monotonicity and Reasoning with Exceptions