All Stories

  1. Cohen’s convention, the seriousness of errors, and the body of knowledge in behavioral science
  2. Norms and Practices of Public Argumentation
  3. Thou Shalt Not Squander Life – Comparing Five Approaches to Argument Strength
  4. A Scheme and Critical Questions for the argumentum ad baculum
  5. Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation
  6. Predicted as observed? How to identify empirically adequate theoretical constructs
  7. Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions
  8. Identifying Linked and Convergent Argument Structures
  9. Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law
  10. De-Biasing Legal Factfinders
  11. Newcomb’s problem isn’t a choice dilemma
  12. An Eco-cognitive Model of Abductive Reasoning
  13. Slippery Slope Arguments in Legal Contexts: Towards Argumentative Patterns
  14. Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation
  15. Generalization in Legal Argumentation
  16. From Stories—via Arguments, Scenarios, and Cases—to Probabilities: Commentary on Floris J. Bex's “The Hybrid Theory of Stories and Arguments Applied to the Simonshaven Case” and Bart Verheij's “Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilit...
  17. A Dialectical View on Conduction: Reasons, Warrants, and Normal Suasory Inclinations
  18. Conceptual Spaces: Elaborations and Applications
  19. Hypothesis-Testing Demands Trustworthy Data—A Simulation Approach to Inferential Statistics Advocating the Research Program Strategy
  20. Data replication matters to an underpowered study, but replicated hypothesis corroboration counts
  21. Falsification
  22. Peirce Knew Why Abduction Isn’t IBE—A Scheme and Critical Questions for Abductive Argument
  23. From Discovery to Justification: Outline of an Ideal Research Program in Empirical Psychology
  24. Logic, Reasoning, Argumentation: Insights from the Wild
  25. Legal Facts in Argumentation-Based Litigation Games
  26. Does giving reasons pro and contra reduce biased decision-making in legal contexts?
  27. Causal Argument
  28. ERRATUM to “Miss Rate Neglect in Legal Evidence” by Christian Dahlman, Frank Zenker and Farhan Sarwar, Law, Probability and Risk . doi:10.1093/lpr/mgw007
  29. Extending a Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect to a Research Program
  30. Argument-Based Bayesian Estimation of Attack Graphs: A Preliminary Empirical Analysis
  31. A probabilistic analysis of argument cogency
  32. Miss rate neglect in legal evidence
  33. From reasonable preferences, via argumentation, to logic
  34. Reconstructing Recent Work on Macrosocial Stress as a Research Program
  35. Beyond Schools: Reply to Marsman, Ly, and Wagenmakers
  36. Continuity of Theory Structure: A Conceptual Spaces Approach
  37. Introduction: Reasoning, Argumentation, and Critical Thinking Instruction
  38. Using conceptual spaces to exhibit conceptual continuity through scientific theory change
  39. Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents: The State of the Art
  40. Applications of Conceptual Spaces
  41. Communication, Rationality, and Conceptual Changes in Scientific Theories
  42. Editors’ Introduction: Conceptual Spaces at Work
  43. The Laws of Belief—Ranking Theory and its Philosophical Applications
  44. From Euler to Navier–Stokes: A Spatial Analysis of Conceptual Changes in Nineteenth-century Fluid Dynamics
  45. Editors’ introduction: social dynamics and collective rationality
  46. Basic Concepts of Structuralism
  47. Perspectives on Structuralism
  48. Modeling Diachronic Changes in Structuralism and in Conceptual Spaces
  49. From Features via Frames to Spaces: Modeling Scientific Conceptual Change Without Incommensurability or Aprioricity
  50. Perspectives on Structuralism, Munich, Germany, 16–18 February 2012
  51. Bayesian Argumentation
  52. What Do Normative Approaches to Argumentation Stand to Gain from Rhetorical Insights?
  53. Bayesian Argumentation: The Practical Side of Probability
  54. Theory change as dimensional change: conceptual spaces applied to the dynamics of empirical theories
  55. Review of Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman
  56. Experts and Bias: When is the Interest-Based Objection to Expert Argumentation Sound?
  57. Parmenides as Secret Hero. Gregor Betz’s Theorie Dialektischer Strukturen (Theory of Dialectical Structures)
  58. Designing an Introductory Course to Elementary Symbolic Logic within the Blackboard E-learning Environment
  59. Analyzing Social Policy Argumentation: A case study on the opinion of the German National Ethics Council on an amendment of the Stem Cell Law
  60. Using Conceptual Spaces to Model the Dynamics of Empirical Theories
  61. Eemeren & Garssen's Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory
  62. Lakatos’s Challenge? Auxiliary Hypotheses and Non-Monotonous Inference
  63. Monotonicity and Reasoning with Exceptions