What is it about?

This paper describes and analyses existential, locative and possessive predications in Kamas. Starting from a functional-semantic perspective, we show that the three types of predications share many features, but they also exhibit some important differences. Given that two layers of Kamas can be distinguished, we demonstrate that the reactivated Kamas of the last speaker, Klavdiya Plotnikova, exhibits some peculiarities which can be explained partly by Russian influence. The most important result of the study is that the boundaries between the three predication types are rather fluid in Kamas, whereas the distinction between affirmative and negative clauses is morphosyntactically unambiguously manifested. This polarity split, given that it is seldom recognised in the general literature, may provide important implications for linguistic typology and theory.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Existential, locative and possessive predication in Kamas, Journal of Uralic Linguistics, May 2024, John Benjamins,
DOI: 10.1075/jul.00024.dab.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page