What is it about?
This is a ten-year review of all the studies conducted to compare the outcomes of coronary bypass surgery which is invasive to percutaneous coronary intervention which is less invasive in managing diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.
Featured Image
Photo by jesse orrico on Unsplash
Why is it important?
This comparative review enlightens us on the pros and cons of both procedures in managing diabetic patients with coronary artery disease in terms of complications and outcomes.
Perspectives
This review helps us to make an informed decision on whether to propose an open bypass surgery or a less invasive percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.
Dato' Dr Ahmad Farouk Musa
Monash University
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Is Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Surgery Still Preferable to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in View of Long-Term Outcomes among Diabetic Patients?, June 2022, IntechOpen,
DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.104993.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
