What is it about?
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), the multicriteria decisions making support methodology widely recognized and accepted as the prioritization and choice theory may deliver different answers for a decisional problem, providing various rankings of its alternative solutions. The variety in priorities order exists because there are many methods that can be successfully implemented within the AHP, although its inventor, Thomas Saaty strives to convince researchers that there is only one.
Featured Image
Photo by Cristofer Jeschke on Unsplash
Why is it important?
Statistically significant findings convince that REV concedes other methods being under study what authorize to claim that from the perspective of this research, as long as reciprocal pairwise comparison matrices are considered (condition embedded in the AHP), it should not be perceived as the dominant method.
Perspectives
The research described in this paper reveals some important discoveries within this field due to application of novel scenario for computer simulations concerning the entire AHP framework (contrary to single matrix simulation results).
Paul Thaddeus Kazibudzki
Universite Internationale Jean Paul II de Bafang
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: On Some Discoveries in the Field of Scientific Methods for Management within the Concept of Analytic Hierarchy Process, International Journal of Business and Management, March 2013, Canadian Center of Science and Education,
DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v8n8p22.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
