What is it about?
In the post-war context addressed by Orhan Pamuk, the voice of an irrevocable and haunting historical loss elaborated by Tanpinar was to acquire a 'name,' as well as specific properties that Pamuk distilled from Tanpinar's own forlorn spaces. Huzun in Pamuk's purview embodies what Benita Parry, in her seminal work Postcolonial Studies: A Materialist Critique, has termed "the consciousness of historical continuity". Pamuk's fiction strives to replenish a certain crisis of memory as an ongoing struggle to ward off the danger of a bequeathal of consciousness being rendered illegible. In Pamuk's oeuvre, the struggle over the articulation of consciousness is mediated and re-mediated through the post-progressive moment: his writing operates in the fading political light of a secular, modern, progressivist, Kemalist republicanism. The existential nihilism that for Wendy Brown results from post-progressive time, and that Pamuk captures in his melancholic vignettes of post-imperial Istanbul, pervades much of the memorial writing produced in the basin.
Featured Image
Photo by Xiaoyi Huang on Unsplash
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: “I remember, I remember so as not to forget!” Orhan Pamuk’s Melancholic Agency and the Splenetic Périples of Mediterranean Writing, September 2018, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.4324/9781315644035-3.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
