What is it about?

In this case study, I explore the challenges associated with writing a detailed and insightful ethnography whilst simultaneously maintaining organization and participant anonymity. The case study is based on my personal research experiences of conducting a multi-sited ethnographic study with three fire and rescue services and an independent fire training company. I reflect on the ethical dilemmas inherent in ethnographic research that requires close researcher involvement with their research participants. I put forward some strategies for writing ethnographic fieldnotes and findings that enable the researcher to balance presenting colourful insights into their research participants’ worlds whilst simultaneously maintaining participant anonymity.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This is a teaching case study. By the end of this case study, students should be able to: • Differentiate between procedural, situational and relational ethics; • Demonstrate an understanding of how to anonymise participant information; • Appreciate the challenges of anonymisation inherent in ethnographic studies; • Demonstrate an awareness of different approaches to writing ethnography.

Perspectives

Between 2009 and 2013, I conducted a multi-sited ethnography based in England with three fire and rescue organizations and one independent fire service training organization. The aim of my study was to explore how organizational cultural norms impacted how organizational members conceptualized and coped with workplace stressors. Over the period of the study, I spent time each week with the organizations involved, and I employed a range of research methods. These included semi-structured one-to-one interviews with managers, semi-structured focus group interviews with firefighters, document and artefact analysis, informal and naturally occurring conversations with staff, and participant observation activities (including participating in incident training and simulations, and community safety and engagement events). My research concluded that the dominant firefighter culture impacted how stress was perceived in these institutions. Within this culture, stress was conceptualized as a weakness and this perception ultimately led to organizational members being reluctant to talk about stress or engage with stress management interventions. Furthermore, my research coincided with a period of tense industrial relations due to a series of government reforms and spending cuts which the firefighters deemed to undervalue their role in society. As my fieldwork progressed, I realized that there was a cultural sensitivity to both my research topic (stress) and the timing of my research (a period of uncertainty and tense industrial relations). Indeed, throughout my study, I often reflected on the ethical challenges associated with writing up my dynamic, colourful and multifaceted exchanges with my research participants whilst at the same time, maintaining participant and organizational anonymity. As I moved onto the formal ‘writing up’ stage of my research, this challenge became more acute as I had to decide what detail should be published. In this case study, I explore these ethical challenges and put forward some suggestions based on my own research experiences to enable the research to maintain a balance between doing no harm and writing an insightful ethnography.

Angela Mazzetti
Newcastle University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Writing Ethnography, January 2023, SAGE Publications,
DOI: 10.4135/9781529669084.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page