What is it about?

Objective: To determine whether the efficacy of neural mobilisations in patients with spinally referred leg pain depends on the presence and type of criteria used to define neural mechanosensitivity (NM) Conclusion: The nonexistence of studies in patients with negative neurodynamic tests prevents inferences whether neural mobilisations are effective in the absence of NM. The criteria used to define NM may not impact substantially on the efficacy of neural mobilisations. The mostly high risk of bias and heterogeneity prevents firm conclusions. Clinical implications: Neural mobilisations seem beneficial to reduce pain and disability in spinally referred leg pain independent of the criteria used to interpret neurodynamic tests.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Neural mobilisation is effective regardless of criteria to determine presence of NM

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Does the efficacy of neurodynamic treatments depend on the presence and type of criteria used to define neural mechanosensitivity in spinally-referred leg pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis, South African Journal of Physiotherapy, July 2022, AOSIS Open Journals,
DOI: 10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1627.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page