What is it about?

Since late 2000s, the political landscape in Bangladesh moved from democracy to an authoritarian kleptocracy, and experienced a new set of political and social narratives. This paper aims to contest some of these dominant/official narratives which have been discursively constructed and promoted by the secularist parties (including the ruling regime) and groups in Bangladesh over recent years. Examining the sociopolitical and historical facts and figures of the country, we have identified five major contested narratives related to (a) Bengali nationalism in East Pakistan, (b) foundational ideology of Bangladesh’s war of liberation, (c) state-sponsored Islamization in Bangladesh, (d) pro-liberation and anti-liberation dichotomy, and (e) war crimes trial. Drawing on a robust content analysis of the credible secondary sources substantiated by qualitative interviews, we have examined these dominant narratives and found that they are not supported by historical evidence and popular mandate, yet have been constructed largely to support and legitimize the current authoritarian regime. The paper offers both counter-narratives and some pragmatic policy recommendations to elude increasing polarization and sociopolitical instability and foster a peaceful democratic society in Bangladesh.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

It analyzes both of the narratives critically based on historical evidence.

Perspectives

You may learn what you have not learned yet regarding the narratives of Bangladesh politics, history, religion, and ideology.

Dr. Md Nazrul Islam
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Islam, Politics and Secularism in Bangladesh: Contesting the Dominant Narratives, Social Sciences, March 2018, MDPI AG,
DOI: 10.3390/socsci7030037.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page