What is it about?

From the early days of phycology, coralline algae (CA) have been considered the most formidable and widely distributed algae (Woelkerling, 1988). They compose an abundant and highly diverse group, divided into geniculate (articulated) and non-geniculate species (crusts and rhodolith/maërl forms). CA are present in almost every coastal ecosystem around the world, from the intertidal to mesophotic zones (Johansen, 1981; Steneck, 1986; Foster, 2001). They are important ecosystem engineers that provide hard, three-dimensional substrates for a highly diverse fauna and flora (Nelson, 2009), building habitats like the globally distributed rhodolith (or maërl) beds (Foster, 2001), and the large algal bioconstructions that abound in the Mediterranean (coralligenous assemblages, intertidal rims; Ingrosso et al., 2018). In addition, the CaCO3 precipitation within cell walls leads to a high fossilization potential of CA, which are considered the best fossil record among macrobenthic autotrophs since they first appeared in the Lower Cretaceous (Aguirre et al., 2000). It also makes CA major carbonate producers (van der Heijden and Kamenos, 2015), which considering their abundance and wide distribution gives them an important role in oceanic carbon cycling and reef building (Adey, 1998; Chisholm, 2003; Martin et al., 2006; Perry et al., 2008) and makes them a group of significant economic interest (Coletti et al., 2017). Like many other marine ecosystems, CA habitats will be negatively affected by future climate change, e.g. due to reduced CA calcification/growth (Martin and Hall-Spencer, 2017; Cornwall et al., 2019) that may eventually lead to ecosystem degradation and reduction of habitat complexity and biodiversity. Despite the importance of CA and their susceptibility to climate change, the knowledge about these algae is still limited. The nine research articles and one review article in this Research Topic contribute to broadening our understanding of CA across many themes. Genetic variation and reproductive strategy of the European rhodolith species Phymatolithon calcareum was studied by Pardo et al. at large to small scales across 15 sites in the North Atlantic, showing that (i) the rhodolith beds are dominated by tetrasporophytes, potentially due to stability of the habitat, and (ii) that these populations exhibit little sexual recombination (few gametophytes) and low dispersal resulting in high genetic structure. Pardo et al. note that the presence of triploid thalli in Northern regions may further explain the wide distribution of this species in Europe. In the Gulf of Mexico, rhodolith beds represent a vital macroalgal spore repository that may aid in community recovery after environmental disturbance. In this context, Fredericq et al. describe the endolithic phototrophic diversity of rhodoliths, expanding upon original descriptions of endolithic dinoflagellates and haptophytes (Krayesky-Self et al., 2017). The study validates the microscopic identification of algal and fungal cells within rhodolith skeletons and might set to rest the previous debate regarding their cell entry that apparently occurs through tetrasporangial compartments in the sloughing species Sporolithon sinusmexicanum. Adding to our understanding about the ecological importance of CA, Rindi et al. review CA research in the Mediterranean, beginning with early records and taxonomy, highlighting the importance of these species in geological records and ecosystem functions, and culminating in threats Mediterranean CA face due to climate change. This thorough review identifies knowledge gaps in different fields that should be approached by interdisciplinary research teams spanning the Mediterranean. Regarding the economic importance of CA, Magill et al. experimentally assessed Corallina officinalis turf and species assemblage recovery after canopy removal, finding that higher growth rates and sediment accumulation in harvested turfs facilitate a full community recovery within 4-6 months post-harvest. Studies on CA combining ecological and physiological aspects are increasingly used to understand the prevalence and dominance of certain CA species in specific habitats, but also to infer about their potential responses to climate change. In this context, Tâmega et al. examine the role of two tropical crustose CA in early colonization and compare their growth and physiological response to irradiance levels in different reef habitats and sites. While the CA are abundant in mature reef communities, they are not among early colonizers and the higher growth and productivity rates of Porolithon onkodes under high irradiance in the reef environment seems to be the driving force behind the species’ competitive advantage over Lithophyllum stictaeforme. In another study, Sordo et al. assess the effects of seasonal light and temperature variability on the physiology and hence, productivity of the rhodolith Phymatolithon lusitanicum in a temperate rhodolith bed, also showing that this species exhibits a high sensitivity to temperature-related climate change scenarios. At a different scale, the microsensor study of Hofmann et al. gives new mechanistic insights into a strong biological control of Arctic CA over the calcification process, particularly in the dark, which may be a determining factor for predicting their responses to climate change, i.e. ocean acidification (OA). In this context, there is a growing body of evidence on the sensitivity of adult and early life history stages of CA to OA (Martin and Hall-Spencer, 2017), to which the study of Ordoñez et al. contributes by showing that while OA conditions potentially enhance photosynthesis and respiration, they also reduce growth of Porolithon onkodes recruits. On the other hand, Johnson et al. report that calcification, but not photosynthetic efficiency of the adult tropical crustose CA Lithophyllum congestum is negatively affected by OA, with more pronounced impacts under fluctuating pH regimes. Reduced growth of under OA conditions when combined with increased temperature, is also demonstrated by Marchini et al. in the articulated intertidal Ellisolandia elongata, a negative effect that is accompanied by shifts from a rich and diverse mobile associated fauna to a more simplified and depauperate community. In summary, research efforts on CA like those in this special issue should be fostered, as the acceleration of environmental crises related to climate change, widespread coastal pollution, and growing ocean overexploitation represent current and future threats to these organisms and associated ecosystems. Specifically, research should capitalize on increasing our understanding of CA responses to environmental changes and for the development of alternative tools to mitigate these impacts.

Featured Image

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Editorial: Coralline Algae: Globally Distributed Ecosystem Engineers, Frontiers in Marine Science, May 2020, Frontiers,
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00352.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page