What is it about?
The article presents an analytical tool for understanding religions as changing networks. The article explains the usefulness of this tool by looking at the work of Robert T. Browne, particularly his book The Mystery of Space. By applying the analytical tool and situating Browne's work within a network of discourses, the article challenges this conclusion.
Featured Image
Photo by Bryan Goff on Unsplash
Why is it important?
The article is a pioneering work on Browne's thinking. His work has not received the scholarly attention it deserves. This is surprising given Browne's influence in the Harleem Rennaisssance and his original thinking.
Perspectives
I hope that because of this article, a) hybridization processes in religions will be reconsidered and that the analytical tool presented here can contribute to this, and b) that Robert T. Browne's work will receive more attention in the scholarly debate on African-derived religions as well as esotericism. Writing this article was a challenge, as Browne's work is complex and under-researched. However, it was also a pleasure to dive deep into his thoughts. Also, since I started writing the article, I have had many interesting conversations about Browne.
Dr. des. Yves Mühlematter
Universitat Zurich
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: It Is (Not) All Theosophy: “Hybridity” and “Hybridization” in Robert T. Browne’s The Mystery of Space, Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society, November 2022, Brill Deutschland GmbH,
DOI: 10.30965/23642807-bja10055.
You can read the full text:
Resources
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page
