What is it about?

This study looks at how people in Jordan experience pharmacy services, focusing on whether pharmacists follow good ethical and professional practices during everyday interactions. We asked over 700 patients about their experiences when visiting community pharmacies, including whether pharmacists explained how to use medicines, discussed possible side effects, respected privacy, and treated patients fairly. The results showed that most people believe pharmacists are professional, respectful, and fair. However, there were important gaps in how medicines are explained. Many patients reported that pharmacists often do not provide enough information about medication safety, such as side effects, drug interactions, or proper storage. In addition, privacy during consultations was not always fully ensured, mainly due to the lack of dedicated counseling spaces in pharmacies. Overall, the study shows that while pharmacists in Jordan are trusted and valued, there is still room for improvement in communication and patient-centered care. Improving these areas can help patients better understand their treatments and use medicines more safely.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This study is important because it highlights a key gap between ethical intention and clinical practice in community pharmacy settings. While pharmacists are perceived as fair and professional, critical elements of safe medication use—such as counseling on side effects and drug interactions—are often insufficient. The findings are timely as pharmacy practice globally is shifting toward patient-centered care and expanded clinical roles. Without strong communication and privacy standards, ethical principles like autonomy and patient safety cannot be fully achieved. This work provides evidence that improvements in training, pharmacy design (privacy spaces), and regulatory standards are needed. It offers practical insights for policymakers, educators, and healthcare organizations to strengthen Good Pharmacy Practice (GPP) and improve patient outcomes. Ultimately, enhancing ethical pharmacy practice is not only about professional behavior—it directly impacts medication safety, adherence, and public trust in healthcare systems.

Perspectives

Working on this study was particularly meaningful because it connects ethical theory with real-world pharmacy practice. It highlights an important reality: pharmacists are often committed to doing the right thing, yet system-level constraints—such as workload, infrastructure limitations, and commercial pressures—can hinder the consistent delivery of optimal patient-centered care. What stood out most is the gap between how patients perceive pharmacists as trustworthy professionals and the actual depth of clinical communication they receive. This reinforces the idea that ethics in healthcare is not only about intention, but about how consistently it is translated into daily practice. The observed pattern—strong fairness and professionalism alongside weaker privacy and safety counseling—reflects a deeper tension between operational realities and ethical responsibility. From a broader perspective, these findings resonate with the higher objectives of Islamic ethical thought, which emphasize the preservation of life, intellect, and human dignity. In this context, healthcare practice is not merely a professional duty but also a moral responsibility. The pharmacist’s role therefore extends beyond technical dispensing toward safeguarding patients through beneficence, confidentiality, and just service. When counseling is limited or transparency is compromised, this represents not only a clinical gap but also a deficit in relational ethical competence. Additionally, informal practices reported by some participants—such as dispensing near-expiry medicines without adequate disclosure, favoring certain products due to commercial incentives, or extending into unsupervised prescribing—highlight the complex intersection between commercial pressures and ethical care. These behaviors, even if not systematically measured, raise important concerns about patient safety, trust, and professional accountability. Ultimately, this work reinforces that ethical pharmacy practice is not achieved through regulatory compliance alone, but through a continuous alignment between professional actions, patient needs, and moral responsibility. I hope this study contributes to advancing a more structured, transparent, and patient-centered model of pharmacy care, and encourages further dialogue on how to better support pharmacists in fulfilling both their clinical and ethical roles.

Dr. Hisham E. Hasan
Jordan University of Science and Technology

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Public Perceptions of Ethical and Professional Practice in Jordanian Community Pharmacies: A Cross-Sectional Study, Patient Preference and Adherence, March 2026, Taylor & Francis,
DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s578660.
You can read the full text:

Read

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page