Psychology Students' Feedback on Teaching Quality at PUCV

“

From a research methodologist's perspective, this study can be viewed through several key lenses: 1. Methodological rigor: - Qualitative approach: The use of a qualitative case study method is appropriate for exploring in-depth perceptions and experiences. The semi-structured interviews allow for flexibility and depth, capturing nuanced insights that structured surveys might miss. - Sampling techniques: The combination of purposive and snowball sampling ensures that key informants with relevant experiences are included, enhancing the richness of the data. 2. Validity and reliability: - Triangulation: By interviewing a diverse group of participants (new and experienced teachers, head of studies, and students), the study triangulates data sources, which strengthens the validity of the findings. - Expert validation: The use of experts to validate the interview script adds to the reliability of the data collection process, ensuring that the questions are relevant and appropriately framed. 3. Contextual relevance: - Case study focus: The specific focus on the Psychology department at PUCV provides a detailed context that can offer valuable insights for similar departments or institutions. However, the findings may need to be cautiously generalized to other contexts. - Cultural and institutional context: The study is situated within the Chilean higher education system, influenced by the 2018 Higher Education Law. This context is important for understanding the specific challenges and opportunities related to teaching quality and feedback mechanisms. 4. Practical implications: - Actionable insights: The study provides practical recommendations for improving feedback processes, such as creating institutional support spaces and fostering dialogue between teachers and students. These insights can be directly applied to enhance teaching practices. - Continuous improvement: Emphasizing the need for continuous improvement aligns with best practices in educational research, promoting a culture of ongoing development and adaptation. 5. Challenges and limitations: - Feedback implementation: The study highlights challenges such as delays in feedback delivery and the need for more actionable insights. Addressing these issues is critical for the practical application of the findings. - Generalizability: While the case study approach provides depth, the findings may not be easily generalizable to other contexts without considering cultural and institutional differences.

”