Hidden Gems from the Communication of Innovations and Network Literature

What is it about?

Why do certain articles, particularly innovative ones, go unnoticed inCommunication? In light of this issue, two particular articles merit greaterCommunication? In light of this issue, two particular articles merit greaterattention. Nam and Barnett (2010) contribute to a broader understanding ofattention. Nam and Barnett (2010) contribute to a broader understanding ofmedia substitute theory by drawing on diffusion research. Barnett and Parkmedia substitute theory by drawing on diffusion research. Barnett and Park(2014) investigated the Internet as a concentration of many communication(2014) investigated the Internet as a concentration of many communicationnetworks. Communication researchers have disregarded these two articles thatnetworks. Communication researchers have disregarded these two articles thatrequire greater attention. The authors believe that employing an atomic andrequire greater attention. The authors believe that employing an atomic andcognitive strategy in communication research impedes our potential to obtaincognitive strategy in communication research impedes our potential to obtainthe renowned academic reputation that a broader perspective and techniquesthe renowned academic reputation that a broader perspective and techniqueswould facilitate. Restructuring research practices in Communication to betterwould facilitate. Restructuring research practices in Communication to bettercomprehend society will result in new insights and findings.comprehend society will result in new insights and findings. (2) (PDF) Hidden Gems from the Communication of Innovations and Network Literature. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378328398_Hidden_Gems_from_the_Communication_of_Innovations_and_Network_Literature [accessed Aug 27 2024].

Featured Image