What is it about?

Kai Akagi considers what the speeches in Acts 10 and 17 say about Jesus when they speak of him as a judge. This historical and literary study reveals that Jesus' role as a judge both suggests that he judges with divine authority and expresses his identity as Jewish messiah. (from back cover)

Featured Image

Why is it important?

Kai Akagi considers the christological significance of Jesus' role in judgement in the speeches in Acts 10:34–43 and 17:22–31. Reading these speeches as part of the narrative of Luke-Acts with attention to scriptural use and influence, along with extended analysis of judgment figures in Jewish pseudepigraphal and Qumran literature, reveals that the scope of Jesus' judgment and the use of scriptural patterns in the speeches suggest his divine authority by associating him with God's final judgment at the resurrection. At the same time, his judgment identifies him as the appointed human messiah whom the speeches proclaim. While further tracing the contours and characteristics of messianism and mediatorial figures in Judaism contemporary with the beginnings of Christianity and the New Testament texts, this volume integrates study of the speeches in Acts, Lukan theology, early christology, and scriptural use and influence, whether direct and through the shaping of collective cultural knowledge. (publisher summary)

Perspectives

Within the discipline of New Testament Studies, the christological significance of judgment has been overlooked. Prior studies focused on christology in judgment in particular New Testament texts affirmed that those texts presented Jesus in the role of a judge, but did not develop significantly how this role relates to differences between judgment by other figures in the context of Second Temple Judaism and God's judgment. This study includes exegetical studies of pseudepigraphal texts, Qumran literature, and the speeches in Acts 10 and 17. The study of Acts 17:22-31 notes parallels with a pattern of Jewish polemic to a greater extent than in previous research and challenges the dominating interpretation of this speech in anglophone scholarship.

Dr Kai Akagi
Rikkyo Daigaku

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: Proclaiming the Judge of the Living and the Dead, January 2019, Mohr Siebeck,
DOI: 10.1628/978-3-16-156904-3.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page