What is it about?
A general assumption in unconventional development is that horizontal wells in close vertical proximity tend to interfere with each other, causing the ultimate recovery of each well to be diminished to the extent that their stimulated rock volume (SRV) overlaps. However, recent findings show that certain variations may result in beneficial acceleration of production without significantly affecting ultimate recoveries. We have observed cases where wells in close proximity show an increased recovery efficiency and acceleration without impact to EUR. This paper attempts to model 3 theories that could help explain this behavior and allow practitioners to leverage this results to improve field development efficiency.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
The learnings from this study have the potential to add significant value in terms of return on investment (ROI) and net present value (NPV) to projects across the Permian Basin. This document provides a different perspective of well interference, showing that it could be another tool to improve reservoir production rather than a detriment of tight well spacing, as it is conventionally considered. It will be particularly useful for optimizing vertical and lateral spacing of unconventional wells in the Permian Basin.
Perspectives
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Understanding the Advantages and Disadvantages of Unconventional Well Stacking and Interference, January 2023, American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG),
DOI: 10.15530/urtec-2023-3866237.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page