What is it about?
Many trauma survivors face challenges of impaired functioning, limited activities and reduced participation. Recovery from injury after acute care, therefore, becomes an important public health issue. This commentary discusses a framework for evaluating outcomes of acute care.
Featured Image
Why is it important?
In our view, classifying disability outcomes and recovery process outcomes in relation to the intended results of interventions creates a powerful tool for research in trauma care. First, such classifcation complements the concept of disability as a decrement in health,5 forming a basis for understanding the effectiveness of trauma care in restoring health. Second, it places the outcomes of multiple interventions within the dimensions of achieved recovery and sustained health after trauma. Third, the classifcation forms a basis for studying disability outcomes as predictors of subsequent interventions (e.g., readmission resulting from adverse events caused by treatment). Fourth, it advances the standardization of outcome measurement, forming a basis for comparing fndings across studies and sites. Finally, the classifcation provides criteria for appraising the literature on outcomes of trauma care.
Read the Original
This page is a summary of: Classifying outcomes of care for injured patients, Canadian Journal of Surgery, December 2014, Canadian Medical Association (CMA),
DOI: 10.1503/cjs.004114.
You can read the full text:
Contributors
The following have contributed to this page