What is it about?

Art and design, the article argues, do not narrow the future to what can be predicted – to a very limited version of what the future could be. They are suggestive of the future, not predictive. They maintain the agency of future generations. The article introduces second-order cybernetics as a way of thinking that has benefited enormously from this insight, which, nevertheless, does not take a stance against technological progress. As an interdisciplinary practice, the focus of second-order cybernetics is on integration. Second-order thinking, the article argues, is essentially poetic. It foregoes prediction in favour of the potentiality of encountering tomorrow’s delights.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

The article introduces the problematics of the classical two-valued logic on which Western thought is generally based, outlining that under the conditions of its logical assumptions the subject I is situated in a world that it cannot address. In this context, the article outlines a short history of cybernetics and the shift from first- to second-order cybernetics. The basic principles of Gordon Pask’s 1976 Conversation Theory are introduced. It is argued that this second-order theory grants agency to others through a re-conception of living beings as You logically transcending the I. The key principles of Conversation Theory are set in relation to the poetic forms of discourse that played a key role in art as well as philosophical thinking in China in the past.

Perspectives

Second-order thinking, the article argues, is essentially poetic. It foregoes prediction in favour of the potentiality of encountering tomorrow’s delights.

Dr. Claudia Westermann
Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University

Read the Original

This page is a summary of: On delight: Thoughts for tomorrow, Technoetic Arts, March 2018, Intellect,
DOI: 10.1386/tear.16.1.43_1.
You can read the full text:

Read

Resources

Contributors

The following have contributed to this page