Thoracoabdominal Asynchrony Measurement: Comparing Two Methods

What is it about?

The study compared respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP) and optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) for measuring thoracoabdominal asynchrony in 27 individuals, including healthy subjects, patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Results showed that both methods provided very similar measurements of asynchrony at rest and during exercise, with no significant differences between them. The study found good agreement between the two methods and concluded that either method can be used to evaluate thoracoabdominal asynchrony, considering their advantages and disadvantages.

Featured Image

Why is it important?

This study is important because it compares the use of respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP) and optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) in measuring thoracoabdominal asynchrony (TAA). Understanding the agreement between these two techniques is crucial for determining the most suitable method for evaluating TAA in various populations, including healthy individuals, patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Key Takeaways: 1. The study found that RIP and OEP provide similar measurements of TAA, with no significant difference between the two methods. 2. Both methods showed good agreement in healthy individuals, as well as in patients with ILD and COPD, except for cases with a wide variability in phase angle (PhAng) values. 3. TAA evaluation during exercise, particularly at moderate and intense levels, is relevant for understanding the impact of various conditions on respiratory function and dysfunction. 4. OEP and RIP have different principles of measurement and important differences, such as cost, ease of use, and space availability in the laboratory, which should be considered when choosing a method for evaluating TAA. 5. This study contributes to the decision-making process regarding the best method for assessing TAA, taking into account study design, purpose, and laboratory constraints.